Critical Analysis of Morphosyntactic Errors and Methodological Rigor in an Undergraduate Thesis Writing

Authors

  • Sri Suci Suryawati Author

Keywords:

EFL, Morphosyntax, error analysis, Undergraduate thesis

Abstract

This research offers a detailed critical analysis of an undergraduate thesis writing entitled "Teaching and Learning Descriptive Text by Using Cooperative Learning Method," submitted to an English Education department. The analysis conducts on two interconnected levels. First, it systematically identifies, categorizes, and corrects prevalent morphosyntactic errors within the thesis manuscript, examining their implications for academic clarity, credibility, and scholarly communication in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. Error categories include subject-verb agreement, article usage, prepositional errors, verb tense consistency, plurality, and sentence structure issues. Second, the article provides a substantive evaluation of the thesis's research design, methodological execution, analytical depth, and contribution to the existing body of knowledge on Cooperative Learning (CL) in EFL writing instruction. While acknowledging the study's novel process-oriented focus on CL implementation, the analysis reveals significant constraints, including an extremely limited data collection period, superficial application of qualitative analysis frameworks, and weaknesses in research instrument design. The synthesis concludes that the thesis's potential contributions are substantially hindered by these linguistic and methodological shortcomings. Based on this dual critique, the research presents targeted recommendations for enhancing academic writing proficiency among EFL thesis writers and proposes more robust methodological designs for future qualitative inquiry into classroom-based pedagogical processes. This integrated approach aims to inform both the advancement of EFL academic writing standards and the improvement of empirical research in language education

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belmekki, A., & Baghzou, S. (2022). Algerian EFL Secondary School Students’ Attitudes towards Using Group Investigation Cooperative Learning Model for Teaching English School Projects. Arab World English Journal, 13(2), 500–511.

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Caicedo Triviño, P. A. (2016). Using Cooperative Learning to Foster the Development of Adolescents’ English Writing Skills. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 18(1), 21–38.

Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40–58.

Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.

Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition 2nd edition. Oxford university press.

Ferris, D. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing. University of Michigan Press.

Flick, U. (2022). An introduction to qualitative research.

Haegeman, L., & Guéron, J. (1998). English grammar: A generative perspective. John Wiley & Sons.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge university press.

James, C. (2013). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Routledge.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. Active Learning—Beyond the Future, 59–71.

Lyman, F. T. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students. Mainstreaming Digest, 109(1), 113.

Manchón, R. M. (2020). Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3(4), 305–360.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. (No Title).

Prior, M. T. (2015). Emotion and discourse in L2 narrative research. Multilingual Matters.

Sabarun, S. (2011). Improving writing ability through cooperative learning strategy. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 1(1), 41–48.

Slavin, R. E. (2022). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. In Contemporary issues in primary education (pp. 102–111). Routledge.

Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms (Vol. 31). Multilingual Matters.

Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

Tracy, S. J. (2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.

Zheng, L., Gao, L., Huang, Z., Shi, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2025). A systematic meta-analysis of the impacts of group awareness tools on learning achievements, learning behaviors, and learning perceptions from 2010–2023. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Critical Analysis of Morphosyntactic Errors and Methodological Rigor in an Undergraduate Thesis Writing. (2025). The Journal of Language and Literature Insights, 2(3), 27-37. https://journal.edukasiliterasibangsa.com/index.php/jlli/article/view/54

Similar Articles

21-27 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.